Today, the Supreme Court has given a sharp response to the stalemate between the farmers and the government regarding the new agricultural laws. The court expressed displeasure with the central government and asked why you do not hold the law?

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today has given a sharp response to the stalemate between the farmers and the government over the new agricultural laws. In opposition to the agricultural laws, the food givers of the country have been standing on the border of Delhi for more than 45 days. Eight rounds of talks have been held to end the stalemate, but no agreement has been reached on the issue of agricultural laws. Farmers sitting on a dharna on the border of Delhi have warned to intensify the agitation by holding farmers' parades in the national capital and other parts of the country on Republic Day. Many farmers have lost their lives since the demonstration started at the end of November. The protesting farmers are not willing to accept anything less than repealing the agricultural laws.




The Supreme Court will deliver its judgment on Tuesday on a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the three farm laws that were enacted last September. During a hearing on the matter Monday, the apex court indicated that it could even stay the implementation of the new laws to ostensibly "facilitate" a solution.
The Supreme Court on Monday expressed frustration over the ongoing negotiations between the Center and the farmers regarding the new Farmer Law Bill. A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobade said, "What is going on? States are rebelling against your laws. We are very disappointed with the negotiation process. "
Apart from Chief Justice SA Bobade, the bench hearing the case also included Justice SS Bopanna and Justice V Subramaniam. The bench said, "We do not wish to make any misleading remarks but we are very disappointed with the process. This is a very delicate situation. "

The bench said, "Not a single petition has been filed before us stating that these three agricultural laws are beneficial to the farmers." The Supreme Court reiterated the committee's requirement regarding agricultural laws and said that if the committee If suggested, he will stop its implementation.